<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
>

<channel>
	<title>MSBLOG &#187; DPM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msblog.org/category/dpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msblog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/5.0" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;MSBLOG 2003-2006</copyright>
		<managingEditor>msblog@msblog.org (MSBLOG)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>msblog@msblog.org</webMaster>
		<category>MSBLOG Podcast's</category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>msblog, microsoft, blog, microsoft news, microsoft beta, microsoft products, beta news, Internet Explorer 6.0,Exchange Server 2003,Office 2003,Outlook 2003,Outlook Express 6.0,Windows 2000,Windows 98, Windows Server 2003,Microsoft Update,Windows XP,More Solution Centers,Windows,Windows XP,Windows 2000,Windows 98,Windows Update,Windows Millennium Edition,Windows, Vista, Longhorn,Office Products,Office 2003,Office XP,Outlook 2003,Access 2003,Excel 2003,Developer Tools,Visual Basic, NET, 2003,ASP.NET 1.1,NET Framework, Windows, Windows Server, Windows Server R2,Visual Basic 6.0,Visual Studio .NET 2003, Money and Business Solutions,Money,Works,Windows SharePoint Services, SharePoint Team Services, CRM, Xbox and Gaming,Games ,Photos and Publishing,Dgital Image Pro,Digital Image Suite,Internet and MSN,Internet Explorer 6.0,MSN,Outlook Express 6.0,Internet Information Services 6.0,Internet Information Server 4.0, Servers,Windows Server 2003,Exchange Server 2003,Exchange 2000 Server,Windows NT Server 4.0,SQL Server 2000,Hardware,Broadband Networking,SideWinder,Audio and Video,Windows Media Services 9 Series,Windows Media Player 9 Series, Reference, Educational,MapPoint,Streets &amp; Trips,Encarta, Google, MS, MSFT, News, beta,Windows 2000,Windows 98,Windows Millennium Edition,Windows NT Workstation 4.0,Windows Update,Windows XP Embedded,Windows XP Professional x64 Edition,Windows XP Service Pack 2,Windows XP Add-On Programs, Plus! ,Digital Media Edition,Plus! Windows Messenger 4.5, products; headlines; downloads; news; Web site; what's new; solutions; services; software; contests; corporate news; microsoft, anti-microsoft, anti microsoft, antimicrosoft, punch bill gates, microsoft boycott, the microsoft boycott campaign, microsoft sucks, microsoft boycott campaign, boycott microsoft, boycott micro$oft, bill gates, windows, microsoft windows, boycott campaign, boycott, campaign, microsoft campaign, msbc, micorsoft, microsofot, mirosoft, micro-soft, mcrosoft, microsft, micosoft, microsot, microsof, micro soft, windows nt, windows 2000, windows 98, windows me, windows xp, windows server, iis, xbox, .net, bill gates, william gates, william h gates, steve ballmer, dos, ms-dos, microsoft office, microsoft excel, excel, microsoft word, microsoft powerpoint, powerpoint, microsoft webtv, webtv, dos, ms-dos, ms dos, linux, os/2, os2, apple, macintosh, apple macintosh, amiga, acorn, unix, solaris, open source, open-source, zack, zacknet, software, free, download, blog, msn, space, cheap, domain, music, funny, UK, phones, microsoft, windows, server, longhorn, vista, Patrick, Zack, Andre, Jabez, Joseph</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Podcasts from the guys who shaped Windows Server 2003 R2 - revealing the latest news behind the closed doors of Microsoft.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>From the guys who shaped Windows Server 2003 R2 - revealing the latest news behind the closed doors of Microsoft.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>MSBLOG</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Technology">
  <itunes:category text="Computers"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology">
  <itunes:category text="Information Technology"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology">
  <itunes:category text="Developers"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>MSBLOG</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>msblog@msblog.org</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.msblog.org/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager V2 Beta 2 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2007/06/01/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-v2-beta-2-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2007/06/01/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-v2-beta-2-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msblog.org/index.php/2007/06/01/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-v2-beta-2-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people have been waiting months for this day, when sometime in the 9&#8242; clock hour, Beta 2 of Version 2 was released! This groundbreaking release for DPM has so much to offer which hasn&#8217;t been previously announced. If you ever thought about DPM and maybe weren&#8217;t as impressed in the past, even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people have been waiting months for this day, when sometime in the 9&#8242; clock hour, Beta 2 of Version 2 was released! This groundbreaking release for DPM has so much to offer which hasn&#8217;t been previously announced. If you ever thought about DPM and maybe weren&#8217;t as impressed in the past, even as recently as Beta 1, you MUST revisit your decision. Some of the brand-new features include file protection support for XP and Vista machines (domain joined), protection of Virtual Server&#8217;s configuration AND *running* virtual machines, Windows Sharepoint 2.0 and 3.0 (3.0 natively, 2.0 through SQL backup), SQL 2000 (natively, yes! &#8211; not previously going to be supported, but with recent development now is &#8211; of course, 2005 was already previously natively supported in beta 1), all kinds of Exchange stuff including CCRs and other things beyond my knowledge, System State, and much more!</p>
<p>Â Including, what I want to announce to the whole WORLD!!!!!! You do NOT need to add a whole disk to the DPM storage pool anymore! There is now what is called &#8220;Custom Volumes&#8221;, where you can create your own seperate partitions for the replica and recovery point areas, which then you specify for each PG/workload. This means you are now able to have 1, count them ONE, hard drive to run DPM! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I know there are tons of people out there who even wanted to just *test and try* DPM, but couldn&#8217;t because they didn&#8217;t have the hardware requirement of 2 HDs&#8230;. not anymore, test to your hearts content!</p>
<p>Â Oh, and BTW, there is a bug bash contest going on for Beta 2 &#8211; see Connect for details. Also, the beta is public, so that means anyone can still join the beta on Connect even to this day.</p>
<p>Â Look for a lot of posts to come about DPM &#8211; most of the content covered in detail you will only find written by me! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2007/06/01/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-v2-beta-2-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Protection Manager SP1 Beta Signup Closed</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/09/data-protection-manager-sp1-beta-signup-closed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/09/data-protection-manager-sp1-beta-signup-closed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 06:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msblog.org/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a great response to the SP1 beta signup! Congrats on all those who emailed dpmtb[at]microsoft.com to sign up for the beta of Service Pack 1. The signup period has now closed due to reaching the maximum number of people. Hope everyone signed up for the beta and will submit lots of bugs! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a great response to the SP1 beta signup! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Congrats on all those who emailed <font size="2">dpmtb[at]microsoft.com to sign up for the beta of Service Pack 1. The signup period has now closed due to reaching the maximum number of people. </font></p>
<p>Hope everyone signed up for the beta and will submit lots of bugs! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Â =- Joseph Bittman DPM MVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/09/data-protection-manager-sp1-beta-signup-closed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPM V2 Beta Will Be OPEN</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/28/dpm-v2-beta-will-be-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/28/dpm-v2-beta-will-be-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msblog.org/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through a very trusted friend of mine who emailed a public DPM address, I have come to know that the DPM V2 is planning on being open to the public as was V1. I bet this means SP1 will be public also (which I expected in the first place). Â Although the plan may be for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through a very trusted friend of mine who emailed a public DPM address, I have come to know that the DPM V2 is planning on being open to the public as was V1. I bet this means SP1 will be public also (which I expected in the first place).</p>
<p>Â Although the plan may be for it to be public right now, it could change in the future. Assuming it will be public though, it is almost 100% certain that the first details of the signup will be posted to the DPM web site at <a href="http://www.msblog.org/go.php?http://www.microsoft.com/dpm" title="(924 hits)">http://www.microsoft.com/dpm</a>. &#8211; Check there often for any new details!</p>
<p>Â =- Joseph Bittman DPM MVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/28/dpm-v2-beta-will-be-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to join DPM&#8217;s SP1 or V2 TAP?</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/22/want-to-join-dpms-sp1-or-v2-tap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/22/want-to-join-dpms-sp1-or-v2-tap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 16:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msblog.org/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone! DPM has released an email address to email if you are interested in joining the normalÂ DPM SP1 or specialty V2 TAP beta. . . . there isn&#8217;t an email address for the normal V2 beta. The email address is: &#8220;dpmtb[at]microsoft.com&#8221;! Quote from source: &#8220;Among the exsiting DPM V1 customers we are looking for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone! DPM has released an email address to email if you are interested in joining the normalÂ DPM SP1 or specialty V2 TAP beta. . . . there isn&#8217;t an email address for the normal V2 beta. The email address is: &#8220;<font size="2">dpmtb[at]microsoft.com&#8221;!</font></p>
<p>Quote from source:</p>
<p>&#8220;<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Among the exsiting DPM V1 customers we are looking for customers who want to participate in our beta for Service Pack 1.</span><span style="font-family: Verdana">Â </span><span style="font-family: Verdana"></p>
<p /></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial" /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">SP1 enables:</span><span style="font-family: Verdana">Â </span><span style="font-family: Verdana"></p>
<p /></span></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">protection of 64 bit production servers</span><span style="font-family: Verdana">Â Â </p>
<p /></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">protection of production servers with Single Instance Store (SIS) enabled</span><span style="font-family: Verdana">Â Â </p>
<p /></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">allows for protection of clustered production servers</span><span style="font-family: Verdana">Â Â </p>
<p /></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">and has a roll up of all fixes</span></div>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">If interested in testing, shoot an email to dpmtb[at]microsoft.com&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Posted at blogs.technet.com/dpm by Marc Kamstrup.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Enjoy! &#8211; Joseph Bittman DPM MVP</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/22/want-to-join-dpms-sp1-or-v2-tap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Protection Manager vs. DFS Replication in Windows Server 2003 R2</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/15/data-protection-manager-vs-dfs-replication-in-windows-server-2003-r2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/15/data-protection-manager-vs-dfs-replication-in-windows-server-2003-r2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Elliott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msblog.org/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has published two great resources for planning a DPM or Windows Server 2003 R2 DFS-R (or both) deployment. Check out DPM and Windows 2003 R2 DatasheetÂ and Data Protection in DPM and Windows Server 2003 R2 for details. Be sure to visit the Microsoft CFS Team Blog to see other great articles onÂ file services and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has published two great resources for planning a DPM or Windows Server 2003 R2 DFS-R (or both) deployment.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.msblog.org/go.php?http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/9/e/79eb09f5-b0e9-4716-90c7-e0fc1e3afd73/DPM_Datasheet.pdf" title="(581 hits)">DPM and Windows 2003 R2 Datasheet</a>Â and <a href="http://www.msblog.org/go.php?http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/dpm/evaluation/r2dpm.mspx" title="(770 hits)">Data Protection in DPM and Windows Server 2003 R2</a> for details.</p>
<p>Be sure to visit the <a href="http://www.msblog.org/go.php?http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/" title="(903 hits)">Microsoft CFS Team Blog</a> to see other great articles onÂ file services and storage features in Windows Server, Windows XP, and Windows Vista &#8212; be sure to leave comments too &#8212; they&#8217;re a really cool bunch of people (shameless plug &#8212; I&#8217;m one of their MVPs <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8212; but really, you should check it out)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.msblog.org/go.php?http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/archive/2006/04/14/425170.aspx" title="(664 hits)">http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/archive/2006/04/14/425170.aspx</a></p>
<p>PatrickE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/04/15/data-protection-manager-vs-dfs-replication-in-windows-server-2003-r2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPM SP1 Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/03/23/dpm-sp1-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/03/23/dpm-sp1-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msblog.resdev.net/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you are about to get the latest info on the beta &#038; release timeframe of DPM&#8217;s first Service Pack. . . . . Karan has stated in the newsgroups: Â &#8221;The release time frame for SP1 is early summer of this year.&#8221; Also about the beta build(s) of SP1: &#8220;There *might* be some paperwork (NDA) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you are about to get the latest info on the beta &#038; release timeframe of DPM&#8217;s first Service Pack. . . . . Karan has stated in the newsgroups:</p>
<p>Â &#8221;The release time frame for SP1 is early summer of this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also about the beta build(s) of SP1: &#8220;There *might* be some paperwork (NDA) involved as this will be unreleased software. &#8221;</p>
<p>Â What does the NDA quote mean? Probably means that it may/may not be a private beta.</p>
<p>For everyone interested, SP1 will have the ability to *protect* x64 file servers, but the ability for the *DPM Server* to run x64 will be presented in V2. I sure hope that Virtual Server comes up to bat with x64 guest OSes by the time of V2&#8242;s beta!</p>
<p>Have questions? Drop a comment here or in the DPM NG at microsoft.public.dataprotectionamanger&#8230;</p>
<p>-JB MCSD.NetÂ  -Â  DPM MVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/03/23/dpm-sp1-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPM Beta By Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/26/dpm-beta-by-summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/26/dpm-beta-by-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msblog.resdev.net/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest commitment to what will be in V2 of DPM and the timeframe was just posted in the NG. It is now officially confirmed that V2 will have multi-domain support (not to mention the already known SQLÂ &#038; Exchange support)! As far as the timeline of RTM? &#8211; 2nd half of 2007. Direct quote from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest commitment to what will be in V2 of DPM and the timeframe was just posted in the NG. It is now officially confirmed that V2 will have multi-domain support (not to mention the already known SQLÂ &#038; Exchange support)! As far as the timeline of RTM? &#8211; 2nd half of 2007. Direct quote from Karan:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the next release of DPM is in H2 of 2007. We will have the beta<br />
version with Exchange and SQL support (including support for multiple<br />
domains) by summer of this year. Given where we are in the development<br />
cycle, it is hard to give more exact dates.&#8221;</p>
<p>Â Did you read that closely? &#8211; Beta version &#8220;by summer of this year&#8221;!!! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Does that statement mean literally BY this summer (meaning pre-summer) or &#8216;by the end&#8217;? My gut level response would be somewhere DURING summer and not before, as it seems very early for another beta. But even if it occured late summer, that still is 1 year or more until RTM in 2007! What does this mean? &#8211; My guess, private beta.</p>
<p>Stay tuned!</p>
<p>-JB DPM MVP MCSD.Net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/26/dpm-beta-by-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd DPM Agent Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/18/odd-dpm-agent-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/18/odd-dpm-agent-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msblog.resdev.net/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Several people are reporting an issue with the DPM File Agent&#8217;s service starting/stopping after applying recent hotfixes. The symptoms are in the event logs and resemble: DPM File Agent service entered a running state. DPM File Agent service was successfully sent a start control. DPM File Agent service entered the stopped state.   This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  Several people are reporting an issue with the DPM File Agent&#8217;s service starting/stopping after applying recent hotfixes. The symptoms are in the event logs and resemble:</p>
<p>DPM File Agent service entered a running state.<br />
DPM File Agent service was successfully sent a start control.<br />
DPM File Agent service entered the stopped state.</p>
<p>  This behavior occurs on a frequent and definitely not designed basis.</p>
<p> Anyone experiencing this problem should add a comment to this post and/or post in the DPM NG with details at microsoft.public.dataprotectionmanager&#8230; or the web UI through the Community page at microsoft.com/dpm. Please specify whether you recently installed any DPM or other product hotfixes. Thanks!</p>
<p>- Joseph Bittman MCSD.Net DPM MVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/18/odd-dpm-agent-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPM V2 BETA LATER THIS YEAR</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/13/dpm-v2-beta-later-this-year-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/13/dpm-v2-beta-later-this-year-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msblog.resdev.net/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   This just in from the DPM Team. Version 2 Beta of DPM *should* be available later this year!! This was a rather vague estimate but &#8220;should&#8221; definitely means &#8220;should&#8221;! Included in DPM V2 is support for Exchange and SQL Server. DPM will probably also have Multi-Domain support. Exact quote from the DPM NG: &#8220;A beta for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>   This just in from the DPM Team. <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Version 2 Beta of DPM *should* be available later this year!! This was a rather vague estimate but &#8220;should&#8221; definitely means &#8220;should&#8221;! <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Included in DPM V2 is support for Exchange and SQL Server. DPM will probably also have Multi-Domain support.</p>
<p>Exact quote from the DPM NG: &#8220;A beta for DPM V2 should be available later this year.&#8221; &#8211; Nirman</p>
<p>- Joseph Bittman DPM MVP | MCSD.Net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/02/13/dpm-v2-beta-later-this-year-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Patch Available For DPM</title>
		<link>http://www.msblog.org/2006/01/29/new-patch-available-for-dpm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msblog.org/2006/01/29/new-patch-available-for-dpm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bittman MCSD .Net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msblog.resdev.net/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    Hot off the press! New patch correcting Short File Name collusion and access denied errors in DPM! The KB article isn&#8217;t live quite yet, but you can get the patch by calling in FREE to Product Support Services and asking for the patch related to QFE 911169.  What the symptoms look like: #1 Access Denied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    Hot off the press! New patch correcting Short File Name collusion and access denied errors in DPM! The KB article isn&#8217;t live quite yet, but you can get the patch by calling in FREE to Product Support Services and asking for the patch related to QFE 911169.</p>
<p> What the symptoms look like:</p>
<p>#1 Access Denied Error in DPM UI</p>
<p>#2 For the more beefy details, I&#8217;ll leave it to my trusted friend, Karan, from DPM: <img src='http://www.msblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;The problem occurs because during a consistency check, both the long name<br />
and the short name of each file must match. Short names are assigned<br />
according to the order in which they are created. Therefore, the short names<br />
of the files on the destination server may not match the short names of the<br />
files on the source server. For example, this problem occurs in the<br />
following scenario: . The LongFileName02.txt file is created on the source<br />
server. The short name of the LongFileName02.txt file is LongFi~1.txt.<br />
      . The LongFileName01.txt file is created on the source server. The<br />
short name of the LongFileName01.txt file is LongFi~2.txt.<br />
      . A consistency check is run. The files are validated by using the<br />
long name in alphabetical order. The LongFileName01.txt file is validated<br />
first.<br />
      . A LongFileName01.txt file is created on the replica. This file is<br />
given the LongFi~1.txt short name.<br />
      . During the next synchronization, the LongFileName02.txt file is<br />
created. The short name of this file is LongFi~2.txt.<br />
In this scenario, the short names of LongFileName02.txt and<br />
LongFileName01.txt are exchanged.</p>
<p>The next time that you run a consistency check, the synchronization fails<br />
because the long name and the short name of each file do not match.<br />
Therefore, the replica remains inconsistent with the source server.</p>
<p>I would recommend installing this hotfix on all DPM servers in production<br />
where you are seeing this problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Now to go call to get it myself!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Joseph Bittman MCSD.Net DPM MVP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msblog.org/2006/01/29/new-patch-available-for-dpm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

