http://www.msblog.org/2007/02/04/systems-management-server-2003-service-pack-3-open-beta/ Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:54:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.msblog.org/2007/02/04/systems-management-server-2003-service-pack-3-open-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-21673 Pamela Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:14:09 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/2007/02/04/systems-management-server-2003-service-pack-3-open-beta/#comment-21673 Wondering if anyone has experienced this problem: I recently(Feb-March) did a merge with 4 main documents, and 4 corresponding merge docs. I had also done this back in December (and prior to that as well but December was the last merge prior to this one). In my main doc, the opening paragraph was a stagnent or dead paragraph. It contained no merge fields (in this current one or any of the previous merges I had done). In this latest merge I just did in Feb-March, in the opening "dead" paragraph, it seems to have picked up the opening paragraph from one of my previos merges. This happened somewhere in the 2 month process of making changes/edits, forwarding the letters to diff pp for their input, verification, approval, etc. When all was ok'd, checked off and the final merge letter was approved by all and sent out (some email and some hard copy), it was noticed/discovered that the opening dead paragraph contained the incorrect language (language that it seems to have picked up and replaced with the language from one of the old merges). Has anyone else experienced this? Is this possible? Anxiosuly await any and all responses to my question. It's a mystery. I'm baffled. (Baffled in K.C.) Wondering if anyone has experienced this problem: I recently(Feb-March) did a merge with 4 main documents, and 4 corresponding merge docs. I had also done this back in December (and prior to that as well but December was the last merge prior to this one).
In my main doc, the opening paragraph was a stagnent or dead paragraph. It contained no merge fields (in this current one or any of the previous merges I had done). In this latest merge I just did in Feb-March, in the opening “dead” paragraph, it seems to have picked up the opening paragraph from one of my previos merges. This happened somewhere in the 2 month process of making changes/edits, forwarding the letters to diff pp for their input, verification, approval, etc.
When all was ok’d, checked off and the final merge letter was approved by all and sent out (some email and some hard copy), it was noticed/discovered that the opening dead paragraph contained the incorrect language (language that it seems to have picked up and replaced with the language from one of the old merges).
Has anyone else experienced this? Is this possible?
Anxiosuly await any and all responses to my question.
It’s a mystery. I’m baffled. (Baffled in K.C.)

]]> http://www.msblog.org/2007/02/04/systems-management-server-2003-service-pack-3-open-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-21496 Systems Management Server 2003 Service Pack 3 Open Beta » D’ Technology Weblog — Technology, Blogging, Gadgets, Fashion, Life Style. Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:46:52 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/2007/02/04/systems-management-server-2003-service-pack-3-open-beta/#comment-21496 [...] MSBLOG [...] [...] MSBLOG [...]

]]>