Comments on: WinFX=.Net 3.0! http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/ Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:54:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rei http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-4511 rei Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:03:03 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-4511 It's a short-sighted misnomer. There's no better way to describe it. It's going to mess up future versions. http://www.petitiononline.com/winfx/petition.html It’s a short-sighted misnomer. There’s no better way to describe it. It’s going to mess up future versions.

http://www.petitiononline.com/winfx/petition.html

]]> By: Target IT » Blog Archive » WinFX=.Net 3.0! http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2449 Target IT » Blog Archive » WinFX=.Net 3.0! Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:50:51 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2449 [...] 3.0! 0 Comments WinFX=.Net 3.0!When speaking to developers about WinFX one question that repeatedly comes up is, “WinFX soundsgreat, but what happens to .NET?” .NET Framework has becomes the most successful developer platform in the world. Developers know and love .NET. [...] [...] 3.0! 0 Comments WinFX=.Net 3.0!When speaking to developers about WinFX one question that repeatedly comes up is, “WinFX soundsgreat, but what happens to .NET?” .NET Framework has becomes the most successful developer platform in the world. Developers know and love .NET. [...]

]]> By: Patrick S http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2429 Patrick S Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:31 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2429 Oh so they have...now its official :) Oh so they have…now its official :)

]]> By: kenlin@HK [MVP] http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2427 kenlin@HK [MVP] Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:14:04 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2427 Well, I did not expect that WinFX will be called .NET 3.0, I thought that it will be released as .NET 2.1 or .NET 2.x Now it is confused as this .NET 3.0 is using .NET 2.0 CLR...... And now, Microsoft is already changed all the site to be name as .NET 3.0 Well, I did not expect that WinFX will be called .NET 3.0, I thought that it will be released as .NET 2.1 or .NET 2.x

Now it is confused as this .NET 3.0 is using .NET 2.0 CLR……
And now, Microsoft is already changed all the site to be name as .NET 3.0

]]> By: MVP KenLin http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2426 MVP KenLin Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:10:12 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2426 Well, I did not expect that it is called .NET 3.0, I thought that it will be released as .NET 2.1 or .NET 2.x Now it is confused as this .NET 3.0 is using .NET 2.0 CLR....... Well, I did not expect that it is called .NET 3.0, I thought that it will be released as .NET 2.1 or .NET 2.x

Now it is confused as this .NET 3.0 is using .NET 2.0 CLR…….

]]> By: Joe http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2425 Joe Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:17:39 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2425 Oh. "WinFX" sounded so much cooler. Oh. “WinFX” sounded so much cooler.

]]> By: Patrick S http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2409 Patrick S Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:12:48 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2409 Ha Ha Anonymous...If you say so, With regard to Surya this is from an MSDN blog so ofcouse they are going to rate their product (it will be an awesome framework anyway :D ) Ha Ha Anonymous…If you say so,
With regard to Surya this is from an MSDN blog so ofcouse they are going to rate their product (it will be an awesome framework anyway :D )

]]> By: Surya http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2403 Surya Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:51:50 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2403 So when and how did .NET become the most successful developer framework? I am quite curious. Is it fact or just a little bit of literary freedom? So when and how did .NET become the most successful developer framework? I am quite curious. Is it fact or just a little bit of literary freedom?

]]> By: Joseph Bittman MVP http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2401 Joseph Bittman MVP Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:10:04 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2401 That is sooo much better! I haven't really looked into WinFX much, but I wasn't expecting it to become the new .Net.... definitely will make me pay more attention to it in the future. Thanks Patrick! That is sooo much better! I haven’t really looked into WinFX much, but I wasn’t expecting it to become the new .Net…. definitely will make me pay more attention to it in the future. Thanks Patrick!

]]> By: Bartys Blog » Microsoft Rechristens WinFX as .Net Framework 3.0 http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2400 Bartys Blog » Microsoft Rechristens WinFX as .Net Framework 3.0 Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:18:13 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2400 [...] Source [...] [...] Source [...]

]]> By: JD’s Weblog http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2399 JD’s Weblog Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:28:27 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2399 [...] Checking out MSBlog (great site for tacking techo Microsoft stuff at btw ) they appear to answer one of Nic’s questions about if the name change will mean a new version of the framework with LINQ and other goodies - the answer appears to be no. It will be built on the .Net 2.0 framework and looks to just add the pillars of WinFX. [...] [...] Checking out MSBlog (great site for tacking techo Microsoft stuff at btw ) they appear to answer one of Nic’s questions about if the name change will mean a new version of the framework with LINQ and other goodies – the answer appears to be no. It will be built on the .Net 2.0 framework and looks to just add the pillars of WinFX. [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.msblog.org/2006/06/10/winfxnet-30/comment-page-1/#comment-2398 Anonymous Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:04:36 +0000 http://www.msblog.org/?p=769#comment-2398 gr8! So now we have 2 WCSes. Windows CardSpace and Windows Color System. Why dont they rename everything else too! Windows Start button, Windows Notepad, Windows Search (so that it can be nicely confused with Windows Live Search which are already 2 of them), Windows DirectX....could go on and on and on...someone give MS naming lessons. gr8! So now we have 2 WCSes. Windows CardSpace and Windows Color System. Why dont they rename everything else too! Windows Start button, Windows Notepad, Windows Search (so that it can be nicely confused with Windows Live Search which are already 2 of them), Windows DirectX….could go on and on and on…someone give MS naming lessons.

]]>